Propter Rem Obligations Doctrine and Condominium Maintenance Fees

Authors

  • Daniel Amaral Carnaúba Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora – Campus Governador Valadares
  • Guilherme Henrique Lima Reinig Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

Keywords:

Condominium, Condominium fees, Propter rem obligation, Peal obligation

Abstract

In Brazilian Civil Law, the maintenance fee charged on the owners of condominiums is frequently labelled as a propter rem obligation. The aim of this article is to investigate the legal significance of such qualification, through the analysis of the structure and the function of propter rem obligations. As to the former, it is shown that propter rem obligation is not an authentic legal concept: Brazilian statutory law intentionally ignores it and legal scholarship has never agreed on fundamental issues concerning propter rem obligations, such as its amplitude or the special rules that govern that alleged obligational category. Nevertheless, propter rem obligation has become an elementary notion within the condominium legal scheme, to the extent that it served as the underlying basis for the introduction of norms that facilitate the collection of condominium fees. Therefore, it can be stated that propter rem obligations carry out several functions in resolution of conflicts arising from condominiums, all of them aimed at protecting condominium associations against defaulting owners.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Daniel Amaral Carnaúba, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora – Campus Governador Valadares

Doutor em Direito Civil pela Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de São Paulo. Mestre em Direito Privado pela Faculdade de Direito da Sorbonne (Paris I). Foi bolsista do Programa de Excelência Eiffel-Égide e pesquisador do Conseil Régional d’Île-de-France. Membro da Rede de Pesquisa de Direito Civil Contemporâneo.

Guilherme Henrique Lima Reinig, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

Doutor e Mestre em Direito Civil pela Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de São Paulo. Foi pesquisador visitante do Instituto Max-Planck de Direito Comparado e Privado Internacional. Membro da Rede de Pesquisa de Direito Civil Contemporâneo.

Published

2018-10-28

Issue

Section

Contemporary doctrine