The Book of Law as “Creator” of Coherence. Some Remarks on Kelsen’s and Troper’s Concepts of “Legal Dogmatics” and “Legal Science”
Parole chiave:
Books of law, Legal dogmatics, Legal scienceAbstract
In this essay, I argue that Kelsen’s and Troper’s concept of legal science, as well as Troper’s divide between legal dogmatics and legal science, are fundamentally flawed, for they fail to recognise the constitutive character of legal science’s epistemic coherence.
Downloads
Downloads
Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2015 Nuno Manuel Pinto Oliveira

Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 4.0 Internazionale.


Civilistica.com è concessa in licenza secondo la