The Book of Law as “Creator” of Coherence. Some Remarks on Kelsen’s and Troper’s Concepts of “Legal Dogmatics” and “Legal Science”
Keywords:
Books of law, Legal dogmatics, Legal scienceAbstract
In this essay, I argue that Kelsen’s and Troper’s concept of legal science, as well as Troper’s divide between legal dogmatics and legal science, are fundamentally flawed, for they fail to recognise the constitutive character of legal science’s epistemic coherence.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2015-08-08
How to Cite
OLIVEIRA, Nuno Manuel Pinto. The Book of Law as “Creator” of Coherence. Some Remarks on Kelsen’s and Troper’s Concepts of “Legal Dogmatics” and “Legal Science”. civilistica.com: revista eletrônica de direito civil, Rio de Janeiro, v. 4, n. 1, p. 1–16, 2015. Disponível em: https://civilistica.emnuvens.com.br/redc/article/view/591. Acesso em: 12 mar. 2025.
Issue
Section
Foreign doctrine