Passado e presente das limitações à liberdade testamentária no mundo da common law
Palavras-chave:
Direito das sucessões, Sucessão testamentária, Testamento, HerançaResumo
O artigo apresenta as limitações históricas à liberdade de testar na common law inglesa, a sua abolição e ressurgimento na Nova Zelândia, Austrália, Canadá e Inglaterra, bem como observa o direito sucessório estadunidense e demonstra como atualmente opera o instituto da Family provision nas jurisdições de common law.
Downloads
Referências
ATHERTON, Rosalind. New Zeland’s Testator’s Family Maintenance Act of 1900 – the Souts, the women’s movement and political compromise. Otago Law Review, vol. 7, n. 2, 1990.
BAKER, K. F. C. 4. England Restrictions on Testamentary Freedom: A Comparative Study and Transnational Implications. International Legal Practitioner, v. 15, n. 1, p. 20–24, 1990.
BALE, G. Limitation on Testamentary Disposition in Canada. Canadian Bar Review, v. 42, n. 3, p. 367–398, 1964.
BANDALI, S. M. Wills in Contemplation of Marriage. Anglo-American Law Review, v. 6, n. 1, p. 6–17, 1977.
BATTS, D. A. I Didn’t Ask to Be Born: The American Law of Disinheritance and a Proposal for Change to a Sytem of Protected Inheritance. Hastings Law Journal, v. 41, n. 5, p. 1197–1270, 1990.
BRASHIER, R. C. Disinheritance and the Modern Family. Case Western Reserve Law Review, v. 45, n. 1, p. 83–184, 1995.
BRASHIER, R. C. Protecting the Child from Disinheritance: Must Louisiana Stand Alone Successions and Donations: A Symposium. Louisiana Law Review, v. 57, n. 1, p. 1–26, 1997.
BURNS, F. The Changing Patterns of Total Intestacy Distribution between Spouses and Children in Australia and England. University of New South Wales Law Journal, v. 36, n. 2, p. 470–513, 2013.
CHAFFIN, V. F. A Reappraisal of the Wealth Transmission Process: The Surviving Spouse, Year’s Support and Intestate Succession. Georgia Law Review, v. 10, n. 2, p. 447–532, 1976.
CHAMPINE, P. Expertise and Instinct in the Assessment of Testamentary Capacity. Villanova Law Review, v. 51, n. 1, p. 25–94, 2006.
CHESTER, R. Should American Children Be Protected against Disinheritance. Real Property, Probate and Trust Journal, v. 32, n. 3, p. 405–454, 1998.
COOKE, E. Wives, Widows and Wicked Step-Mothers: A Brief Examination of Spousal Entitlement on Intestacy. Child and Family Law Quarterly, v. 21, n. 4, p. 423–442, 2009.
COWNIE, F.; BRADNEY, A. Divided Justice, Different Voices: Inheritance and Family Provision. Legal Studies, v. 23, n. 4, p. 566–586, 2003.
CROUCHER, R. F. Statutory Wills and Testamentary Freedom - Imagining the Testator’s Intention in Anglo-Australian Law. Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal, v. 7, n. 2, p. 241–264, 2007.
CROUCHER, R. F. How Free Is Free: Testamentary Freedom and the Battle between Family and Property. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, v. 37, p. 9–27, 2012.
DAINOW, J. Restricted Testation in New Zealand, Australia and Canada. Michigan Law Review, v. 36, n. 7, p. 1107–1130, 1938.
DAINOW, J. Limitations on Testamentary Freedom in England. Cornell Law Quarterly, v. 25, n. 3, p. 337–360, 1940.
EPSTEIN, E. M. Testamentary Capacity, Reasonableness and Family Maintenance: A Proposal for Meaningful Reform. Temple Law Quarterly, v. 35, n. 3, p. 231–258, 1962.
FRATCHER, W. F. Toward Uniform Succession Legislation. New York University Law Review, v. 41, n. 6, p. 1037–1092, 1966.
FRIEDMAN, L. M. The Law of the Living, the Law of the Dead: Property, Succession, and Society Law and Society. Wisconsin Law Review, v. 1966, n. 2, p. 340–378, 1966.
GAUBATZ, J. T. Notes toward a Truly Modern Wills Act. University of Miami Law Review, v. 31, n. 3, p. 497–564, 1977.
GLENDON, M. A. Fixed Rules and Discretion in Contemporary Family Law and Succession Law Symposium on Reflections on the Civil-Law Tradition in Louisiana: Agenda for The Twenty-First Century. Tulane Law Review, v. 60, n. 6, p. 1165–1198, 1986.
GREEN, K. The Englishwoman’s Castle - Inheritance and Private Property Today. Modern Law Review, v. 51, n. 2, p. 187–209, 1988.
HINES, N. W. Freedom of Testation and the Iowa Probate Code Symposium on the New Iowa Probate Code. Iowa Law Review, v. 49, n. 3, p. 724–749, 1964.
KELLY, D. B. Restricting Testamentary Freedom: Ex Ante versus Ex Post Justifications. Fordham Law Review, v. 82, p. 1125-1185, 2013.
KOSSOW, J. R. Probate Law and the Uniform Code: One for the Money. Georgetown Law Journal, v. 61, n. 6, p. 1357–1400, 1973.
KREICZER-LEVY, S. Inheritance Legal Systems and the Intergenerational Bond. Real Property, Trust and Estate Law Journal, v. 46, n. 3, p. 495–542, 2012.
KULZER, B. A. Property and the Family: Spousal Protection. Rutgers Camden Law Journal, v. 4, n. 2, p. 195–236, 1973.
LANGBEIN, J. H.; WAGGONER, L. W. Redesigning the Spouse’s Forced Share. Real Property, Probate and Trust Journal, v. 22, n. 2, p. 303–328, 1987.
LAUFER, J. Flexible Restraints on Testamentary Freedom--A Report on Decedents’ Family Maintenance Legislation. Harvard Law Review, v. 69, n. 2, p. 277–314, 1956.
LE VAN, G. Alternatives to Forced Heirship Forced Heirship in Louisiana. Tulane Law Review, v. 52, n. 1, p. 29–49, 1978.
LESLIE, M. B. Myth of Testamentary Freedom, The. Arizona Law Review, v. 38, n. 1, p. 235–290, 1996.
MADOFF, R. D. A Tale of Two Countries: Comparing the Law of Inheritance in Two Seemingly Opposite Systems. Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, v. 37, n. 2, p. 333–352, 2014.
OLDHAM, J. T. Should the Surviving Spouse’s Forced Share be Retained. Case Western Reserve Law Review, v. 38, n. 2, p. 223–254, 1988.
PEART, N. New Zealands’s Succession Law: Subverting Reasonable Expectations. Common Law World Review, v. 37, n. 4, p. 356–379, 2008.
PLAGER, S. J. The Spouse’s Nonbarrable Share: A Solution in Search of a Problem. University of Chicago Law Review, v. 33, n. 4, p. 681–718, 1966.
SCHREIBER, A.; NELSON KONDER, C. Uma agenda para o direito civil-constitucional. Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 04, 2017.
SHAPO, H. S. A Tale of Two Systems: Anglo-American Problems in the Modernization of Inheritance Legislation. Tennessee Law Review, v. 60, n. 4, p. 707–782, 1993.
TATE, J. C. Caregiving and the Case for Testamentary Freedom. U.C. Davis Law Review, v. 42, n. 1, p. 129–194, 2009.
TURNIPSEED, T. L. Why Shouldn’t I Be Allowed to Leave My Property To Whomever I Choose at My Death (Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Start Loving the French). Brandeis Law Journal, v. 44, n. 4, p. 737–794, 2006.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Raphael Rego Borges Ribeiro
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Civilistica.com está licenciada sob a licença 