‘Woman, but not Human’

Widowhood Practices and Human Rights Violations in Nigeria

Authors

  • Ebenezer Durojaye

Keywords:

Widowhood practices, Nigeria, Human rights, Women’s rights, Foreign doctrine

Abstract

This article examines the implications of widowhood practices for the enjoyment of women’s fundamental rights and freedoms in Nigeria. The article discusses the effects of socio-cultural and legal structures of Nigeria for gender equality. It argues that the plural legal system in the country, which encourages the application of statutory law side by side with customary law, can potentially undermine women’s fundamental rights. The article then discusses specific human rights of women, particularly the rights to dignity and
non-discrimination that are threatened by widowhood practices. In conclusion, it is argued that since Nigeria has ratified international and regional human rights instruments such as the Convention on Elimination of All forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) and the Protocol to the African Charter on the Rights of Women (African Women’s Protocol), it is obligated to take appropriate steps and measures to eradicate harmful cultural practices that may violate women’s rights.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Armstrong, A., Beyani, C., Himonga, C. et al (1993). ‘Uncovering reality: excavating

women’s rights in African family laws’, International Journal of Law and the Family 7,

–69.

Ba, M. (1981). So Long a Letter, Dakar: Heinemann.

Banda, F. (2006). ‘Blazing a trail: the African protocol on women’s human rights comes

into force’, Journal of African Law 50, 72–84.

Bond, J. (2010). ‘Gender discourse and customary law in Africa’, Southern California

Law Review 83, 510–70.

Chirwa, D. M. (2006). ‘Reclaiming (Wo)manity: the merits and demerits of the African

protocol on women’s rights’, Netherlands International Law Review 53, 63–95.

Cobbah, J. A. M. (1987). ‘African values and the human rights debate: an African

perspective’, Human Rights Quarterly 9, 309–31.

Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions (COHRE). (2002). Violence: The Impact of

Forced Evictions on Women in Palestine, India and Nigeria, Geneva: COHRE.

Cook, R. J., Dickens, B. M. and Fathalla, M. F. (2003). Reproductive Health and

Human Rights: Integrating Medicine, Ethics, and Law, Oxford: Oxford University

Press.

Donnelly, J. (1984). ‘Cultural Relativism and Universal Human Rights’, Human Rights

Quarterly 6, 400–19.

Donnelly, J. (2003). Human Rights in Theory and Practice, Ithaca: Cornell University

Press.

Eboh, M. P. (1998). ‘The woman question: African and western perspectives’ in E. C.

Eze (ed), African Philosophy: An Anthology, London: Blackwell Publishers, 333–37.

Ewelukwa, U. (2002). ‘Pre-colonialism, gender, customary injustices: widows in

African societies’, Human Rights Quarterly 24, 425–84.

Federal Ministry of Women Affairs. (2006). National Gender Policy, Abuja: Federal

Ministry of Women Affairs.Gunning, I. (1992). ‘Arrogant perception, world traveling and multicultural feminism:

The case of female genital surgeries’, Columbia Human Rights Law Review 23, 189–

Iwobi, A. U. (2008). ‘No cause for merriment: the position of widows under Nigerian

law’, Canadian Journal of Women and Law 20, 37–86.

Lewis, H. (1995). ‘Between “Irua” and “female genital mutilation”: feminist human

rights discourse and the cultural divide’, Harvard Human Rights Journal 21, 1–55.

Mama, A. (1997). ‘Heroes and villains: conceptualising colonial and contemporary

violence against women in Africa’, in M. Alexander et al (ed), Feminist Genealogies,

Colonial Legacies, Democratic Futures, New York and London: Routledge, 46–62.

Margalit, A. (2003). The Ethics of Memory, Cambridge Mass: Harvard University

Press.

Mukasa, R. (2008). The African Women’s Protocol: A New Dimension for Women’s

Rights in Africa, South Africa: Fanele.

National Population Commission (NPC). (2006). National Census, Abuja: NPC.

Nyanzi, S., Emodu-Walakari, M. and Serwaniko, W. (2009). ‘The widow, the will, and

widowinheritance in Kampala: revisiting victimization arguments’, Canadian Journal of

African Studies 43, 12–33.

Obiora, L. A. (1997). ‘Feminism, globalisation and culture: after Beijing’, Indiana

Journal of Global Legal Studies 4, 355–406.

Oyeniyi, A. and Ayodeji, I. (2010). ‘Widowhood practices among the Yorubas of south

west Nigeria: are there differences in what women experience due to their status?’,

Gender and Behaviour 8, 3152–67.

Samuel, G. C. E. (2011). ‘Emergent issues on widowhood practices in Igbo culture:

between the video screen and reality’, Unizik Journal of Arts and Humanities (UJAH)

, 184–93.

Sossou, M. A. (2002). ‘Widowhood practices in West Africa: the silent victims’,

International Journal of Social Welfare 11, 201–09.

Ssenyonjo, M. (2007). ‘Culture and human rights of women in Africa: between light

and shadow’, Journal of African Law 51, 39–67.

Tamale, S. (2004). ‘Gender trauma in Africa: enhancing women’s links to resources’,

Journal of African Law 48, 50–61.

Tamale, S. (2008). ‘The right to culture and the culture of rights: a critical perspective

on women’s sexual rights in Africa’, Feminist Legal Studies 16, 47–69.

Terry, G. (2007). Women’s Rights, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Williams, S. (2004). ‘Nigeria, its women and international law: beyond rhetoric’,

Human Rights Law Review 4, 229–55.

Downloads

Published

2013-10-14

How to Cite

DUROJAYE, Ebenezer. ‘Woman, but not Human’: Widowhood Practices and Human Rights Violations in Nigeria. civilistica.com: revista eletrônica de direito civil, Rio de Janeiro, v. 2, n. 3, p. 1–24, 2013. Disponível em: https://civilistica.emnuvens.com.br/redc/article/view/115. Acesso em: 26 sep. 2025.

Issue

Section

Foreign doctrine